View All Items

Opalite is a type of synthetic glass often mistaken for a gemstone due to its alluring translucence and the play of colors similar to those seen in opals. Unlike natural gemstones, opalite is man-made, primarily from dolomite and metal to create its distinctive shimmering and milky appearance. It typically exhibits a soft, opalescent sheen with a blue or orange glow when light passes through it, making it popular in jewelry and decorative objects.(geologyscience.com)

The European love of tea began in the mid seventeenth century after it had been introduced to the West by the Dutch East India Company. It was at first an expensive luxury item to be enjoyed by the select few including the diarist Samuel Pepys who wrote in 1660 that he was at a meeting attended by, amongst others, Sir Richard Ford, who ‘…talked like a man of great reason and experience. And afterwards did send for a Cupp of Tee (a China drink) of which I never had drank before) and went away.’ Pepys seems not to have been very fond of ‘tee’ which was fortunate because it could cost up to a hundred times more than the sherry for which he had a much greater liking. The consumption of tea demanded the receptacles to brew it in and drink it from and the Chinese happily obliged. At first they sent over bowls and saucers (the tea cup was only to follow around a hundred years later), tea pots and tea ‘caddies’, which, bearing in mind the extremely high cost of the tea, were designedly small. The word is thought to be derived from ‘catty’, the Chinese pound, equal to about a pound and a third in the English standard of weight. The earliest tea caddies were rectangular with four small feet, soon to be followed by a flattened octagonal form with a plain bottom, in both cases being fitted with a round ‘cap’ cover.

During the eighteenth century the repertoire of the tea service expanded considerably to include a teapot, teapot stand, spoon tray, sugar basin and cover, cream or milk jug and cover, a saucer dish for serving small biscuits, tea bowls and saucers and, of course, the small tea caddy and cover itself, all decorated in the same colourings and design. At the same time, the form of the tea caddy was considerably altered and the examples now produced had a flattened rectangular body with an arched top, slightly overhanging. The circular neck was completed by a circular cover with a broad rim and a knob finial above an unglazed central ‘stopper’ which fitted inside the top of the piece. Earlier examples were extremely well defined while the later ones were slimmer and of a less precisely formed shape.This piece, therefore, probably dates to the middle years of the Qianlong period (1736-1795).

Accordingly, we have here an example of the Chinese potter’s work at its best. As the seams at the side indicate, the body of these caddies was mould made in two parts and then joined together with the neck added. An additional attraction here is the fluting to the body which is much less common. The decoration is in underglaze blue, the colour being applied to the body before glazing and firing, and the design is a typical stylised landscape scene, a rocky outcrop in the foreground with trees and pavilions and behind a lake with flying birds and another mountainous range in the background again with buildings. As often, small figures can be seen occupying the nearer pavilions. The shoulder is decorated with a classic stylised geometric pattern border with diaper work and key pattern, the neck has two small floral sprays and the lid has a stylised floral border with cell work. To add opulence to the effect, the caddy (and indeed doubtless all of its companion pieces) was given the enhancement of gilt decoration on its arrival, most likely in one of the London workshops.

Truly, then, this was a luxury item at the time and it has survived in a remarkable state of preservation to the present day, intact and with its original cover, which is quite uncommon. Doubtless now to be admired rather than used, this tea caddy is a true collector’s gem and an outstanding example of the best of Chinese Export ware.

Crown Winsor was a short lived earthenware manufacturer at the Sylvan Works, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent, England, previously the premises of the firm Shaw and Copestake, who traded under the well known name ‘SylvaC’ and went into voluntary liquidation in 1982. A workers co-operative trading under the name of Longton Ceramics attempted to take the business over but with little success and eighteen months later the enterprise was fully taken over by United Co-operative Society and run under the name of Crown Winsor. The Co-operative society already owned the Windsor Pottery works and the Crown Clarence Pottery works which was the source of the ‘Crown Winsor’ name. Production centred on whimsical and novelty items, sometimes made from the old SylvaC moulds but demand proved weak and the business ceased trading in 1989. This teapot is typical of their range and the elaborate cipher underneath seems to read ‘CW’ grandly announcing a trade name which unfortunately had a very short life

Crown Winsor was a short lived earthenware manufacturer at the Sylvan Works, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent, England, previously the premises of the firm Shaw and Copestake, who traded under the well known name ‘SylvaC’ and went into voluntary liquidation in 1982. A workers co-operative trading under the name of Longton Ceramics attempted to take the business over but with little success and eighteen months later the enterprise was fully taken over by United Co-operative Society and run under the name of Crown Winsor. The Co-operative society already owned the Windsor Pottery works and the Crown Clarence Pottery works which was the source of the ‘Crown Winsor’ name. Production centred on whimsical and novelty items, sometimes made from the old SylvaC moulds but demand proved weak and the business ceased trading in 1989. This teapot is typical of their range and the elaborate cipher underneath seems to read ‘CW’ grandly announcing a trade name which unfortunately had a very short life

Both the incised mark at the base and the small round sticker (see image 9) show this to be the work of the distinguished Irish Potter, Michael Kennedy who established his first studio at Sligo, Co Sligo, in 1979 and then a second studio at Gort, Co Gallway. Kennedy was a prolific and popular ceramic artist who was also happy to pass on his skills guiding many young potters at the start of their careers, some of whom went on to open successful potteries of their own. His work at Sligo was distinguished by the imaginative use of purple, pink and blue glazes of which this jug is an excellent example. There are various forms of his signature but the one here, possibly mainly used on his earlier works, is perhaps the most typical, a stick figure within a circle followed by the letters ‘Kennedy’. Michael Kennedy sadly died unexpectedly in 2021, but his works live on and can be seen in homes and galleries in Ireland and abroad.

This bottle has the Breton gentleman on its front face and a fleur de lis to the reverse. The stylised lily, known as fleur de lis, became a symbol of the French royal family and France in general. It occurs, for example, on the Canadian flag but was also regularly used as a decorative motif by the Quimper potteries. These bottles can date to as early as the beginning of the twentieth century but a later time of production is probably a safer assumption here, perhaps to the 1950s. Few of these bottles survive with their fitted stoppers and the traces of cork to the top interior suggest that this stopper has been in place for some time and probably since the date of manufacture.

There are similar plates found, all marked ‘Italy’ to the reverse and some with the lettering ‘SICA’ on the front. This stands for the ‘Società Italiana Ceramica Artistica’ which was founded in Nove, in the province of Vicenza, by G. Battista Cogo, Giovanni Grappiglia, Stefano Guzzo, and Angelo Perin in 1946 and concentrated on the production of modernist domestic earthenware. The style of decoration here and the bright colourings used are typical of the 1950s and this plate most likely dates to that time. There is a naif charm here which is most attractive and this decorative piece could also be used today for serving at the dinner table.

Bing & Grøndahl was established in 1853 by the sculptor Frederik Vilhelm Grøndahl and the merchant brothers Meyer Hermann Bing and Jacob Herman Bing. Their trademark, which can be seen on these two plates, was that of three towers, which was derived from the Coat of Arms of Copenhagen. Their designs proved popular and it is said that their dinnerware service in the ‘Seagull’ pattern could be found in one in ten Danish households in the 1950s. Eventually, in 1987 the company merged with its competitor, the Royal Porcelain Factory, under the name Royal Copenhagen, but some of the pieces produced thereafter still display the initials ‘B&G’ and the three tower symbol, as here. Originally sold with fitted boxes (not included here), these plates were probably produced in the early years after the merger and are sought after as collectors’ items today.

The fine stitching used here is a version of needlepoint termed ‘petit point’ because of the small size of stitches used. In general needlepoint, designs are stitched onto fine canvas using a simple tent stitch, a small, diagonal stitch that crosses over the intersection of one horizontal and one vertical thread of the canvas forming a slanted stitch at a 45-degree angle. Petit point uses the same technique but with much finer stitching and thread on a much finer canvas often requiring magnification for the work to be carried out. It allows more intricate designs and shading effects as can be clearly seen here. The technique was particularly popular in France amongst the aristocracy in the early eighteenth century which perhaps determines the choice of subject here but with their intricate stitching and complementary frames, this pair of tapestries would definitely be a candidate for boudoir accessories in the present day.

The signature here, which occurs on other pieces by the same artist, is for Stuart Akroyd, a celebrated English glassmaker who worked from studios in Sunderland then Sheffield from 1991 to 2021(see image 8). Born in 1966, Akroyd studied at Sunderland University, following this with a Post Graduate Diploma at the International Glass Centre, Brierley Hill. After working as the head maker at Lakeland Crystal, Cumbria he went on to establish his own business, Stuart Akroyd Glass Designs, in 1991, renaming it Stuart Akroyd Contemporary Glass when he moved from Sunderland to Sheffield in 2000. Best known for his sculptural pieces which were inspired by the ‘Skylon’ structure, the well known symbol of the 1951 Festival of Britain, Akroyd also worked on a smaller scale and there a number of small bottles by him of which this is an excellent example. The glass effects are skilful and inventive and the flat panel to the body is both decorative and functional, allowing the level of fluid in the bottle to be seen clearly. Many of his sculptural pieces were made in his later Sheffield workshop which, with its greater space, allowed him to employ the techniques necessary to create them, so it is a reasonable guess that this bottle and its companions belong to the first phase of his output.

‘SylvaC’ (the name was written with a capital ‘C’ after registration of the trademark in 1938) was a trade name of Shaw and Copestake, a company formed by Mr. William Shaw and a Mr. Copestake around 1900. Mr. Copestake sold his shares to a Mr. Richard Hull after about six months of business and this partnership continued until Mr. Hull’s death in 1935. He was succeeded by his son, Mr. Richard Hull junior. In the following year, the business became a limited company. Various mergers and acquisitions followed and in the 1950s new premises were built and production expanded considerably continuing until the early 1980s when changing markets and increased competition forced the company into liquidation.

Sylvac were known for imaginative glazed wares, particularly animals, and novelty pieces with a rustic twist of which this is a typical example. These were mainly produced in the early post war years and this jug most likely dates to the 1950s when demand was at its height. These jugs were made in a variety of colours but the green glaze here is the most characteristic of Sylvac pieces and probably the most attractive.

………………………………………………………………………………….....................................................................................………

Trade with Japan in the seventeenth century was predominantly directed by the Dutch merchants who had a trading station at Nagasaki. It was their requirements which dictated what the potteries at Arita should make and by the 1660s they were demanding ‘red wares’, the Japanese term for pieces in the colourings of underglaze blue, red and gold, sometimes with additional colours as well. Once made, these porcelains were sent to the port of Imari from where they began their journey to the West and from which they were to take their name. They proved to be immediately popular on their arrival in Holland and the auctions of the cargoes as they arrived were extremely successful. This led to a plentiful supply of chargers, bowls and vases (many with covers and some forming part of a five piece garniture) which were to decorate the royal and aristocratic homes not only of Holland itself but throughout Europe and particularly in Great Britain, where they can be seen today.

While the forms were relatively plain, the decoration was lavish, employing panels with floral or animal elements on a densely covered ground, often with swirling designs. Two typical examples are illustrated in images (9) and (10), both dating from the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century. The popularity of the style naturally led to it being copied and the Chinese started to produce it from the late Kangxi period (1662-1722) onwards, occasionally following the originals closely but soon producing their own adaptations which were often slightly more restrained and refined. By the beginning of the nineteenth century, Imari exports from Japan and China had lapsed but their place was soon taken by pieces from the European and British manufacturers. In England both Spode and Mason’s Ironstone, amongst others, produced their own version of ‘Imari’, even attempting vases in the colourings as well as flatware. Eventually Japan re-entered the market and from 1860s onwards the West was again supplied in quantity with their Imari wares, although by the end of the century some of these were of rather poor quality.

But at their best, the Japanese workshops in the nineteenth century could well match the work of their predecessors and this charger is a prime example. The form is almost that of a very shallow bowl with the sides evenly curving upwards (see image 4) and an unglazed footrim to the reverse. The nineteenth century decorators often created their own designs, but the decoration here follows the originals very closely indeed, even in the colouring of the underglaze blue which has an almost blackish tinge which is also seen in the two earlier examples illustrated. There are three large fan shape panels with flowering peony and three smaller ones with lotus leaf borders and ‘ho ho’ birds, all on a blue ground with stylised gilt floral decoration. One can almost see a wheel here and the design nearly seems to be in motion which was, again, a feature of earlier pieces. The reverse has just three sprays of peony which allows one to see the quality of the glaze.This, combined with the paste of the foot and the general quality of the decoration all point to a mid nineteenth century dating, probably circa 1870 after trade with Japan resumed as a result of the Meiji restoration.

Japanese Imari wares deservedly retain their popularity today and this charger would be an elegant addition to a contemporary interior or even indeed to a stately home itself.

Mdina Glass was founded in the Maltese town of Mdina in 1968 by Michael Harris and Eric Dobson. The town had no history of glass making but the venture proved to be a success. Its wares, free formed organic glassware, often in colours inspired from the sea, sand, earth and sky, proved very popular with tourists visiting Malta. This vase is one of the earlier productions made by Mdina (the format of the signature confirms this) probably dating to the 1970s and, if not designed by Michael Harris, it certainly resembles the organic forms he created and the colourings, often referred to as ‘sea and sand’ although more correctly termed ‘blue summer’, reflect this. The raised detail to the sides enhances the overall profile contributing to a piece of satisfying charm.

TV linked merchandise was created even in the earliest days of the medium and this charming small ceramic oil lamp, hardly the safest accessory for the nursery, is an amusing example. Andy sits next to a table with an urn on the top which forms the base of the lamp. Oil or paraffin would have been contained inside and once lit the wick could be adjusted by turning the round flat knob on the side. This has the trademark symbol for the German toy manufacturers Karl Meyer (see image 7). The base is marked ‘FOREIGN’ which was a common requirement for items imported into the UK after the second World War and allowed the makers to conceal their country of origin, which might have been useful to some of them at the time. A true piece of nostagia whether the figure represented is familiar or not.

The firm L.Hjorth is a long established Danish ceramics manufacturer with a history extending back to the mid nineteenth century when the potter Lauritz Hjorth, after serving an apprenticeship at the the Faience factory of Edvard Chr. Sonne and travels abroad, founded a business in his own name in 1859 at Ronne on Bornholm, a Danish island in the Baltic Sea. Success was almost immediate and the firm moved to larger premises three years later concentrating their production on decorative items which by the 1880s were being sold in the big department stores of Paris, London and Berlin, as well as in New York and Australia. Lauritz Hjorth was joined by his children who took over the factory following his death in 1912. The business was to continue for another two generations and two great granddaughters still run today a working museum devoted to the firm’s products.

The abstract mark on the base below ‘L Hjorth’ can be read as ‘HA’ and is found on other pieces, usually accompanied by a model number as here (‘23/41’). It stands for Hans Adolf Hjorth (1878-1966), one of Lauritz Hjorth’s sons, who is known to have fired his first stoneware in 1902. His pieces were sold in his Father’s shop and were very popular, meriting a gold medal at the World Exhibition in Brussels in 1910. A stoneware series in greyish brown was produced from 1913 onwards and this is most likely what we have here (source : Danish House Trading). Certainly, the absence of a reindeer mark, later commonly to be found on L.Hjorth pieces, indicates a dating before 1927 when it was first introduced. Marked pieces in this glaze and colourings are not so often found and especially not in this larger size making this beaker vase a highly desirable collector’s item.

Mdina Glass was founded in the Maltese town of Mdina in 1968 by Michael Harris and Eric Dobson. The town had no history of glass making but the venture proved to be a success. Its wares, free formed organic glassware, often in colours inspired from the sea, sand, earth and sky, proved very popular with tourists visiting Malta. This vase is one of the earlier productions made by Mdina (the format of the signature confirms this) probably dating to the 1970s. The design is known as the ‘tiger pattern’ and is believed to have been created by Eric Dobson himself. All the pieces in the range have individual variations but this particular version is extremely pleasing and highly characteristic of Mdina’s naturalistic style.

[Please note that the stands are not included with these items]

Two Staffordshire potteries produced pieces with the trademark name ‘Falcon Ware’, Thomas Lawrence and J.H. Weatherby & Sons. The name derived from the Falcon Works at Hanley where both the ranges were made. John Henry Weatherby founded the business under his name in 1891 and moved to the Falcon Works one year later. Pieces marked ‘Falcon Ware’ were produced from the mid 1920s onwards and the addition of ‘Royal’ was introduced in the 1930s as a marketing tool. There was in no sense a Royal Warrant! Accordingly, the format of the mark on this dish dates it to the 1930s and it can be seen as a modest rival to the designs of Clarice Cliff, in particular her celebrated ‘Wheatsheaf’ pattern, which other factories imitated as well. The work is, in fact, in no way inferior making this an attractive if modest souvenir of a popular 1930s design.

Orrefors was founded in Sweden in 1898 by Johnan August Samuelson. It then went through a variety of ownerships and also acquired many of its rival glass companies including Kosta Boda. Orrefors became Orrefors Kosta Boda in 1990 and joined The Royal Scandinavia Group in 1997.

Orrefors was founded in Sweden in 1898 by Johnan August Samuelson. It then went through a variety of ownerships and also acquired many of its rival glass companies including Kosta Boda. Orrefors became Orrefors Kosta Boda in 1990 and joined The Royal Scandinavia Group in 1997.

Schramberg were best known for their colourful majolica pieces and worked with well known artists, notably the Hungarian Eva Zeisel, who created innovative designs on their behalf. The pattern here, Adlon, was first produced in the early twentieth century and shows the influence of Art Nouveau. It was reissued in the 1960s, which is the date of this set, and indeed the shapes and decoration equally complement that later era.

Size

(i) Coffee Pot : Ht (max) 23cm, Ht (pot) 17cm, Diam (top) 12cm, Width (max) 19cm, Base 14.6cm (ii) Milk Jug : Ht (max) 7cm, Width (max) 12cm, Base 9cm (iii) Sugar Basin : Ht (max) 7cm, Top diam 8.2cm, Base 9.7cm (iv) Cup : Ht 7.9cm, Width (max) 10cm, Top diam 8cm, Base 5.3cm (v) Saucer : Diam 15cm, Ht 2.5cm, Base 9.5cm

‘SylvaC’ (the name was written with a capital ‘C’ after registration of the trademark in 1938) was a trade name of Shaw and Copestake, a company formed by Mr. William Shaw and a Mr. Copestake around 1900. Mr. Copestake sold his shares to a Mr. Richard Hull after about six months of business and this partnership continued until Mr. Hull’s death in 1935. He was succeeded by his son, Mr. Richard Hull junior. In the following year, the business became a limited company. Various mergers and acquisitions followed and in the 1950s new premises were built and production expanded considerably continuing until the early 1980s when changing markets and increased competition forced the company into liquidation.